Welcome to my most popular blog post. Looks like battery health/life is a big concern amongst my readers!

When I bought my Nissan Leaf at 3 years old, it had 88% battery “health” as reported by the car. Battery degradation is inevitable with electric vehicles, it’s just a question of how much. If you’re interested in what affects battery degradation, I recommend Euan McTurk’s “Plug life Television” channel on YouTube.

The Hyundai Ioniq electric also reports battery health. At 30 months and 27,000 miles the car is reporting 100% via the “Torque” app which reports parameters from the battery management system. I also use the “EVNotify” app, which is aimed at EV drivers, and can notify when the battery reaches a certain state of charge. Note 100% health is not the same as 100% charged. Even a very degraded battery can be 100% charged, but like an old phone, won’t run for long. Now we don’t know exactly how either Nissan or Hyundai calculate the “battery health”. And why should we care? What matters is how much charge the battery can accept- and, ultimately, the range.

I calculated roughly how much charge the Ioniq can take by charging from a fairly low state of charge. Naturally all the figures rely on some assumptions but let’s see how many kWh the battery can take-

The car showed 20 miles remaining out of 125 mile range, that’s 16% on the pack or 4.5kWh remaining. The Polar charger reports I used 25.7kWh at 7kW, which I know from a previous measurement is 95% efficient. So I added ~24.4kWh to the car. 24.4+4.5 = 28.9kWh

Autumn 2019- the car is now 33 months old, with 31k miles – time do do a more methodical battery capacity measurement. The battery management system reports kWh charged, so I used this before and after an almost-complete charge cycle, from 11%. I don’t normally take the car this low. Then there’s a choice of net “display capacity” or gross “BMS capacity”, so lets consider both. Conveniently the battery was at the same temperature before and after charge, any heating will have been compensated for by ambient temperatures around 10degC.

BMS, or gross capacity: 11% to 95% state-of-charge used (7866.8-7841.2) = 25.6kWh

25.6/0.84 = 30.4kWh

Display, or net capacity: 10.5 to 100% state-of-charge, also 25.6kWh

25.6/0.895 = 28.6kWh

Both of these numbers are what I’d have expected from a new Ioniq.

The EVNotify app is a handy way to read battery temperatures and charge rates

As you can see above, the BMS reports two figures for cumulative energy – charged and discharged. This reflects losses in the battery. They differ by 3.2%. We can use this to adjust the above capacity measurements, giving a net available battery capacity of 27.6kWh. Compared to the nominal 28kWh that’s 1.5% different – and probably insignificant given other variables such as battery temperature.

We do know that the Ioniq charges to only 95% of the battery’s true capacity; to roughly 4.1 volts when it could be charged to 4.15 volts. This will help battery life. Tesla are said to use only 90%, which is more tolerable day-to-day, given their larger battery packs.

What can users do to extend battery life further? Three things: keep the battery cool, avoid leaving the battery fully charged for long periods, and avoid unnecessary rapid charging. If you’re really keen, avoid charging to 100% unless you need all the range.

Compared to my Leaf24 at a similar age, the car is at least twice as useful to me. I say this because the Leaf only ever managed one commute before needing a charge. It just didn’t quite have enough for even a gentle second commute on a short B-road route. The Ioniq can do two commutes, even using the motorway driving at the UK speed limit (70mph).

Conclusions I can make so far: the range is still healthy at 125 miles in winter and 150 miles in spring; the battery seems to be accepting more than the nominal 28kWh.

It’s also worth mentioning that some manufacturers quote gross battery capacity (Nissan, Tesla), others net, or useable capacity (Hyundai). Personally I think gross battery capacity as a nameplate figure is misleading, it’s like quoting fuel tank size. There’s much more to consider with EVs than just the fuel tank size!

4 thoughts on “Ioniq electric battery health at 2.75 years old- very healthy, 28.6kWh net capacity *Updated*

  1. The battery charging total will always be higher than the battery delivery total. The difference results because of resistive (heat) losses within the cells, and within the charging circuitry. Further losses occur within the motor control electronics, so the power consumption measurements might need to be adjusted, depending upon which point in the control circuitry is being used. Modern Lithium-based batteries are well above 90% efficient during charging (i.e. total output power will be at least 90% of total charging power), when new, but Lead acid batteries are around 65% efficient when new (i.e total output power will be about 65% of total charging power. As cells age, their efficiency gradually decreases.

    Like

    1. You’re right, there are certainly losses. I previously measured a 5% loss on charging at 7kW, so included that here. This article is more concerned with the loss of battery capacity with time, due to time and charge cycles.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.